|
Unbanned Bible Publications |
|
Defending God’s Truth in Church Doctrine and Political History – Renette Vermeulen |
|
(3) potential… [Brown and Indian land owners are not mentioned.] “The picture of land ownership – and, more specifically, land ownership of high-potential agricultural land – actually looks totally different to what the perception is,” said Pringle. [A correct audit is in progress.] “Twice as much land has been transferred to black entrepreneurs and farmers through ordinary commercial purchases than the state has managed to buy for black owners as part of its land redistribution programme, the study found. These statistics are contained in a comprehensive land audit undertaken by economist Johann Bornman…” (4) Recognises that the current policy instruments, including the willing buyer willing seller policy, and other provisions of section 25 of the Constitution may be hindering effective land reform. [The answer from Jan De Lange, News 24, City Press, prove this to be very incorrect.] (5) [clause 7 removed in amendment] (6) Notes that in his State of the Nation Address, Cyril Ramaphosa, in recognizing the original sin of land dispossession, [what about the original sin when Zulu King Dingaan took the price of the land which he sold to Piet Retief, and murdered him and his party in cold blood, as well as the many attacks and most brutal murders on Trekkers and their children, etcetera. If we must talk about ‘original sin,’ we must be fair and talk about all ‘original sin.’ Weren’t apartheid sin and Marxist revolution sin supposed to have been straightened out at the Truth and Reconciliation Commission after 1994?] made a commitment that Government would continue the land reform programme that entails expropriation of land without compensation, making use of all mechanisms at the disposal of the State, [sounds as if this complete dispossession of their white citizens certainly include forcible removal by police and even the military — what a terrible threat to the small minority of white people!] that must be implemented in a manner that increases agricultural production, [their land-repatriation schemes have made much of the land barren up until now, and diminished much of productive farming and agriculture,] improves food security and ensures that the land is returned to those from whom it was taken under colonialism and apartheid and undertake a process of consultation to determine the modalities of the governing party resolution.” [It would have been totally unnecessary to impoverish and dispossess whites if Mr. Ramaphosa and his predecessors focused on teaching Africans to build their own wealth, and also by curbing the present government’s “sins,” which have, during the past 24 years (now in 2018,) destroyed and ‘withered away’ much of all the country’s perfect infrastructure, productive farming, companies and industries, while more than a million jobs have been lost — and as a result, millions upon millions of African workers, who are supposedly ‘empowered’ by racial discrimination, suffer the most. Then he must look at his party members who live in mansions, drive the most expansive vehicles, and have the best jobs — in fact Africans have nearly all the jobs in the formal sector. Officials have also accumulated for themselves immense wealth through the withering away of the hard-earned taxes of all law-abiding South Africans through billions upon billions that already disappeared through bribery, corruption and mismanagement. These billions could surely have financially empowered many millions of people from the poor masses?] (7) Further notes that any amendment to the Constitution to allow for land expropriation without compensation must go through a parliamentary process as Parliament is the only institution that can amend the Constitution; and with the concurrence of the National Council of Provinces instructs the Constitutional Review Committee to – (a) Review [change] section 25 of the Constitution and other clauses where necessary to make it possible for the state to expropriate land in the public interest without compensation, and in the process conduct public hearings to get the views of ordinary South Africans, policy-makers, civil society organisations and academics, about the necessity of, and mechanisms for expropriating land without compensation; (b) Propose the necessary constitutional amendments where applicable with regards to the kind of future land tenure regime needed, and (c) Report to the Assembly by no later than 30 August 2018.”
Wasn’t the constitution of South Africa, (before and after 1994,) properly negotiated to make whites and all other citizens of South Africa believe what is written in the constitution cannot be changed because it is to protect all South African citizens against exactly the kind of “amendments” or changes to the constitution, which the government is declaring now? Land or any other expropriation was never mentioned by the new government at that time. So, if they can now ‘amend the constitution’ as they please because they are fully set on dispossessing all whites, not just the farmers, what will hinder them in doing the same to other minority groups? We must remember the history of socialism throughout the world and the whole of Africa. When governments in Africa have finally ‘dealt’ with all the whites country by country, they began with their citizens of other races — and for at least 50 years now, they are still making war against their citizens that are not part of their political party or ethnic heritance. It is a misconception that during the socialist struggle in South Africa, and the military onslaughts from superpowers like Russia, Cuba, and Libya from without South Africa, the Bush or Border war that ensued was about race. I don’t know of anyone in South Africa that heard the old government forced whites to do police and military service and lay down their lives, families, and jobs, (supported by many volunteers from other races, Africans included,) to protect the country against people of other races. We were all taught that we were fighting against “The Red Danger;” (“Die Rooi Gevaar,) a.k.a, the expansion and rule of socialism. Of course it is now turned around to say the white man fear the “black danger,” (African governance,) but originally, this was not so as far as I know. I believe, as most other white South Africans as well, that people of other races are not our enemies. Let us never lose sight of the fact that, under the old government, it was racism in the form of apartheid that oppressed and dispossessed people of other races. Not all whites were or are racists. And now, it is racism in the form of socialism that oppresses whites. Not all Africans and people from other races are racists. Þ What do the Two Swords in Lu. 22:36 represent? (“Sell your cloak to buy a sword”) Þ The Power of Praise in Deliverance from Affliction Þ “Deliver us from evil and Restore our souls”
Aftermath of the Boer War; poverty and deprivation Masonic Brotherhoods Rule by Stealth and Deceit Rise of the Afrikaner Brotherhood; the Apartheid Regime
The socialist struggle and Bush or Border War Þ A Prayer for South Africa and the Whole World Þ How Do We Prepare for the end of the End-times we are living in?
|