Unbanned Bible Publications
Defending God’s Truth in Church Doctrine and Political History – Renette Vermeulen
Still, this calculation brings statistics closer to reality, as the pro-British ‘Illustrated History of S.A., p. 256, and ‘South Africa’s Yesterdays,’ p. 23, declare that white women, children and old men in the camps “averaged” 190,000 and non-whites “averaged” 107,344 — a staggering total of R297,344 people.
The “approximate’” death rate in African and Afrikaner concentration camps was an “estimated” 344 per thousand and higher. Thus, the approximate death rate among R297,344 Africans and Afrikaners could not have been less than 102,286 — an average of 34.4% overall!
However, “the worst month for deaths in Afrikaner camps was October 1901, with 401 per 1,000 in the Free State...” In December 1901, the death rate for Africans rose to 436 per 1,000.” “Infant deaths were 629 per thousand!” ‘St. Helena 15.55 South 5.4 West’ wrote, “The death rate in the camps that held women, children and old men was 34%, with 87% at the Kroonstad camp.”
From the numbers in these pro-British books, from population statistics, and the extremely moderate estimation of people abducted from the farms, it is clear that Britain murdered at least 36,926 African and 65,360 Afrikaner women, babies, children and old men in concentration camps. This excludes the numbers of deaths among an “estimated” 56,457 prisoners of war in British colonies at home and overseas. [Other sources say 28,000 Boer men were captured, and 25,630 were sent overseas. I ask again: how can it be coincidence that Britain botched the statistics this way?] Of the captured POWS, an “estimated” 12%-25%, (allegedly “only” 3% in St. Helena,) died in the camps. What did the POWs die from? How many were just callously murdered by madmen and haters of Afrikaners like the executioner of even captured children, “Breaker” Morant?
From the entire Afrikaner population of 322,000, at least 21 people out of every 100 died in British concentration camps. When we consider all the concealed and misinterpreted facts, we can safely assume that at least a quarter of the Afrikaner population was annihilated in the concentration camps, and this excludes prisoners of war sent to British colonies overseas.
So, where do the ‘official concentration camp death statistics’ of R28,000 white and 12,000 non-white civilians (only 40,000 overall instead of 102,286) come from, and why do people believe and condone such lies, which constitute terrible crimes against humanity?
This calculated holocaust was the forerunner of all ‘modern’ social chaos under the rising New World Order, followed by the great Russian Revolution of 1917, which was also typified by the inconceivably cruel, communist gulag-system of death and torture in concentration camps. Dave Hunt explained in ‘Peace, Prosperity, and the Coming Holocaust,’ “Between late 1929 and 1935, (in Russia,) 125 million peasants were uprooted from 25 million individual farms. In the process, 24 million people disappeared from the Soviet countryside: half fled to the cities, 3 million died of starvation in the Ukraine and the Volga Valley; millions more simply vanished into the Arctic, Siberia and China, millions died in forced into labor camps.” - Ibid., Sep. 11, 1982. “Before this, Russia even exported grain. Collectivized farms are a complete disaster, not the magic formula for creating the communist paradise.” [Read about Asian, African and other holocausts in ‘Global Destruction and Mayhem of Socialism and Communism,’ ‘Weird Truth about Nazism,’ and ‘Jewish Holocaust – Truth or Fiction?’]
QUEEN VICTORIA, HER COMMANDERS AND FINANCIERS ARE WAR CRIMINALS
Most horrendously, Queen Victoria, her military advisors, commanders, and financiers intentionally “scorched” two Republics with famine and fire, obliterating an “estimated” 34,000 productive farms and millions of prime livestock in the process. They could have destroyed many more farms and murdered many more civilians — it seems no one knows. They poisoned the water and land with kerosene, salt, and incessant weeds such as Khakibos (named after the khaki uniforms of the English,) and knapse kêrel, (black jacks,) which stick like Velcro. They eradicated great regions of first-rate farmland in the two Republics and destroyed entire herds of thoroughbred horses, cattle and sheep. They actually demolished entire towns such as Lindley and Frankfort.
However, from all these war crimes, it is the callous persecution and grossly minimized, deliberate murder they committed on thousands upon thousands Afrikaner and African women, infants and children, old men and prisoners of war, which prove that Queen Victoria was a common mass murderess and war criminal.
How could she not have foreseen that, to bundle thousands upon thousands of people together in tents in the sweltering heat and blistering cold on the open South African veldt, (and prisoners of war in the tropical heat and the diseased camps of her overseas colonies,) without adequate clean drinking water, sanitation and medication, deliberately starving civilians of all ages to death, would not, during the turn of the 18th century, result in a national holocaust of unrecorded proportions?
Victoria’s Cape Colony Governor Sir Alfred Milner, Cape Prime Minister, masonic/illuminist and mining magnate Cecil John Rhodes, his masonic brother British Colonial Secretary Joseph Chamberlain, and mine owners such as Alfred Beit, Barney Barnato and Lionel Phillips all planned and financed this war together.
I stand with every other writer who declare that “every monarch, who inherited the British throne since then, and refused to ask forgiveness (or even just apologize) for any of these atrocities, share in all Victoria and her helpers’ unspeakable crimes against humanity.”
QUEEN VICTORIA’S PUNISHMENT FOR THE CHILDREN OF ‘BITTEREINDERS’ [THOSE WHO ENDURED] RESULTED IN THE MASS MURDER OF BABIES AND INNOCENT CHILDREN
God commanded in Lev. 5:1, “If a person… is a witness, whether he has seen or known of the matter – if he does not tell it, he bears guilt.”
I am not discriminating against South Africa’s many English speaking people and impartial war correspondents. Some, such as Cornelis Broeksema and Emily Hobhouse, were heroes and heroines, who condemned, disclosed and withstood the countless atrocities of this ‘war’ on thousands upon thousands of unarmed citizens in the two Afrikaner Republics. (Broeksema paid with his life for exposing the most dreadful conditions in the Turffontein concentration camp.)
During 1899-1902, Britain could not conquer the great minority of Boers (or farmer/hunters) man-to-man on the battlefield. Hence, to blackmail Afrikaners into submission, the Mighty British Empire engineered the communist-socialist displacement and dispossession of nearly an entire nation, committing a genocidal holocaust unparalleled in modern history until the Russian communist takeover in 1917, and World Wars One and Two. However, this was not the worst of their war crimes in South Africa. For the men and women, who refused to bow to Britain's Queen Victoria’s brutal imperialism, the British crown had a special punishment in mind.
If Victoria could not lay her hands on these fighters, or break their women through dispossession, incarceration and starvation, she would torture their infants and children to death until they surrender. Victoria separated the children of these “bittereinders” (meaning those who would fight to the bitter end) from their mothers, (as in the case of the little weak, living skeleton Lizzie van Zyl in the Bloemfontein concentration camp,) to starve them meticulously until their parents relented from their ‘foolish’ Afrikaner patriotism and pledge allegiance to the British crown.
W.T. Stead, an English journalist, wrote, “Every one of these children, who died as a result of the halving of their rations, [as all the others that were calculatedly starved to death, and detained in diseased camps,] thereby exerting pressure onto their family still on the battle-field, was purposefully murdered. The [penal] system of half rations stands exposed, stark and unashamedly as a cold-blooded deed of state policy employed with the purpose of ensuring the surrender of men whom we were not able to defeat on the field.”
A PEOPLE’S ARMY VERSUS THE SUPREME BRITISH EMPIRE
The Women were the Marrow in the Bone of the People’s Army
Once the British began to push the Afrikaner women, children, and elderly at the barrels of their guns in 1900, their bayonets met the steel of true Afrikaner resilience. Most Afrikaner women, as their men, were solidified by strife, suffering and sorrow. These women have been fighting shoulder-to-shoulder with their men for the survival and safety of their families since the Trekkers first left the British Cape colony in 1835. They were the marrow in the bone of the hunter/farmer ‘people’s army.’ Most hated scrambled priorities and could not stomach compromise, lies, treason and underhandedness. Surrendering to the British crown was one of the most unfaithful things a Boer ‘Burgher,’ (Farmer Civilian) could do to his God, wife, family, and country.
While some Afrikaners turned traitors with the support of their wives and families, let us salute those Afrikaner women and their men, who would not budge, even under the pressure of complete dispossession, incarceration, starvation, and mass murder! They placed patriotic duty above personal comfort and redemption from suffering, loss, and even death, because they believed, to leave behind a legacy of cowardliness, compromise and disloyalty, was living one’s life without purpose. The British were the enemy that constantly threatened the very existence of Afrikaners and all their descendants here in Africa. These Christian women would feed the enemy if they were hungry, as President Paul Kruger’s wife, Gezina, did while British officers detained her in her Presidential home in Pretoria. Yet, they could not accept collaboration with, or weakness towards militant British intimidation and their spineless war atrocities.
South Africans and the rest of the world, Britain especially, owe respect to all those thousands upon thousands of white and non-white men, women and children, whom Britain, without cause, dispossessed and made to suffer, starve and die most horribly in concentration camps.
The least we can do to honor Britain's thousands of innocent victims, is to let the world know what really happened in South Africa at the dawn of the 20th century. Before, during, and after Britain’s relentless attack on the farmers and other citizens of the two young republics, the Orange Free State and Transvaal, there was a huge attempt to twist their unspeakable war crimes into a ‘gentlemen’s war,’ and to dismiss complaints against dispossession, torture, and mass murder as ‘malicious slander.’ However, bare historical facts extinguish the ‘romantic’ notion that these combat commanders and their half a million Allied troops could not have been ‘gentlemen.’
This was not a war. This was a deliberate holocaust, calculated genocide, the brutal dispossession and impoverishment of nearly all South Africans, and the premeditated theft of all South Africa’s enormous mineral wealth.
THE BACKGROUND OF THIS PLANNED DISASTER
In the 19th century, Imperialist Britain divided South Africa into four colonies, namely the Cape colony, Natal colony and the inland Afrikaner colonies of the Orange Free State and Transvaal, which later became the Zuid Afrikaansche Republiek or the ZAR. In 1854 and 1856, Britain formally granted the Orange Free State and ZAR (Transvaal) independence from British rule. However, Britain kept on interfering chronically with the two Afrikaner Republics. After extremely rich gold deposits were discovered on the Witwatersrand, (which covers a large area of the old ZAR,) Britain annexed the ZAR in 1877, claiming all the gold mines on the Witwatersrand that surrounds Johannesburg. President Paul Kruger of the ZAR visited Britain twice to negotiate renewed independence for the Republic, while passively resisting British expansion in, and their claiming of his country, but to no avail.
In 1880, fierce battles between the invading British and resisting Afrikaners resulted in the First ‘Boer’ War. When British forces jumped off the cliffs at the battle of Amajuba to escape the furiously advancing Boer commandos, (men on horseback) Britain granted the ZAR its independence for the second time in March 1881. However, losing the First ‘Boer’ War under such humiliating circumstances was a lesson in warfare, which Britain would never forget.
In January 1896, Chamberlain and Rhodes declared war against the ZAR by executing an invasion known as ‘The Jameson Raid.’ Britain’s Colonial Secretary Joseph Chamberlain and mining magnate/financier Cecil John Rhodes planned to take the ZAR in a coup d’état to annex all the gold mines around Johannesburg. They first instigated labor riots among the miners, causing a huge revolt among the many British foreigners, or ‘outlanders’ and other workers, who streamed to the Republic during the gold rush. Rhodes then sent Leander Jameson and his Rhodesian and Bechuanaland ‘policemen’ from across ZAR borders to take control of the Republic, and ‘restore order’ to the socialist chaos in the mines. However, President Kruger’s intelligence network warned him in time of the planned invasion. The President sent a small Afrikaner force to ambush Jameson at Doornkop, a few kilometers south of Johannesburg. Jameson and his forces surrendered and he was handed over to Britain for trial, but British media turned Jameson into a hero.
The next time Britain attacked the Afrikaners and Africans of the Orange Free State and the ZAR, she came prepared. Queen Victoria and her war commanders and financiers decided beforehand that this time, they would annihilate the two Republics if the Afrikaners did not surrender unconditionally. Britain’s quest was to also gain control of the huge diamond deposits that were discovered at Kimberley in the Orange Free State in 1866, and the bountiful amounts of gold discovered in the ZAR in 1886.
Under the pretence of fighting for the voting rights of British immigrants in the ZAR, Britain tried to pressure President Paul Kruger into granting them full citizenship. Kruger refused, knowing that this was a plan to defeat his government at the ballet box, thus lifting the Republic into the hands of the British. Britain then began to expand and mobilize her armies in the coastal colonies of the Cape and Natal to take possession of the inland Republics of the Orange Free State and ZAR.
President Steyn of the OFS and President Kruger’s peace negotiations failed in May 1899.
In September 1899, Chamberlain sent an ultimatum, once again demanding full citizenship for British immigrants in the ZAR, which led to the Second ‘Boer,’ or actually, the Second British War of 1899-1902.
THE OBSCURED BIRTH OF THE MISINFORMED AFRIKANER NATION
When Britain seized the Cape in 1795, which belonged to the Dutch since 1652, English masonic orders brought the start of the British Lodge in Cape Town. They encouraged civilians, both English and Dutch, to join their masonic orders and to set up new lodges countrywide. Since that day, Britain had her eye on the whole of Africa. Masonic/Illuminist Cecil John Rhodes, on instruction of the British monarchy, had only one quest: to extend the rule of the British Empire from Cape to Cairo! It was a prize worth possessing at any cost.
[Acknowledgement to the person who compiled this image]
The early Cape colony and later Natal too, were flooded with British immigrants. South Africa’s early white population became divided between two language groups, the Dutch (which later became the Afrikaners,) and the English. Englishmen pursued government and other administrative posts in the cities, pushing out most of the Afrikaners to the countryside to become farmers. Yet, many prominent Afrikaners remained in control of Afrikaner politics and religion, a.k.a. the masonic, Mary Worshipping, Calvinist Dutch Reformed Church. Ordinary citizens might not have had much contact with the ruling British ‘lords’ and other influential “outlanders,” but their leaders, and especially their masonic leaders, sure did.
The real birthplace and spiritual home of masonic orders among Afrikaners, and in particular, Afrikaner leaders, was the Dutch Reformed/Nederduitse Gereformeerde Church. Their English-speaking sister-churches, such as the Methodist/Presbyterian Church assisted her in spawning all kinds of masonic orders on the newfound soil of the Cape colony. Calvinism quickly became just another masonic disease brought to South Africa by Protestant officials of the Dutch East India Company in 1772, when they formed the Masonic Netherlander Lodge De Goede Hoop in Cape Town.
Most Protestants do not know this, but during the Reformation in the 1600s, the masonic Cabalist Sanhedrin (the Jews on top of the worldwide masonic pyramid,) sponsored the Jew, John Calvin, whose real surname was Chauvin, to supposedly ‘break away’ from Catholicism to found Protestantism. Marvelously, Calvinism’s (Dutch Reformed) religious atrocities such as beheading, drowning, and burning their rivals at the stake, and their political apartheid crimes against humanity, are no longer awful secrets as during the rule of the apartheid regime.
The mason AA Cooper wrote in ‘Freemasons of South Africa,’ “A military lodge, Africa No. 1 or De Afrikaan, was established in 1798. In the same year Richard Blake, private secretary to the then Governor of the Cape, Sir George Yonge, formed the Royal York Lodge, which attracted senior officers of the garrison, and business and professional men. Scottish and Irish lodges were established later. In 1819 De Goede Hoop Lodge held a public meeting to hear a report on its education fund… headed by the Governor and his wife, Lord Charles and Lady Somerset.” [How atrocious: masons educating innocent children, polluting susceptible young minds with Lucifarian doctrine!] “It included donations from Dutch Reformed Church members. Sir John Truter, member of the Lodge Education Fund, started the South African College in 1829, supported by the mason Governor, Sir George Napier.”
It is clear that, from the beginning, masons controlled English and Afrikaans speaking church systems, political systems, and the education systems of the young South Africa. Just as in America and England, and throughout the rest of the colonized world, masons founded and governed this country; ferociously spreading masonry, which always has racism, Marxism, and evolution at its core.