THE ECCLESIA CONVERTED TO CHRISTIANITY, Chapter 7 of 8

How Secret Societies Control The Rise And Fall Of Religions,

(The Religious Beast From The Earth, Rev. 13:11-18. )

With evangelists Glen & Renette Vermeulen, courtesy of Now Unbanned Publications C.C.

 

THE CRYSTAL CATHEDRALS OF FAIRY GODMOTHER: 

Co-creatrix and co-redemptrix: 

Christianized or not, Druidic-Romanized religion in all its various forms was, and always will be, the Lucifarian worship of nature and astrology.  [Please read Part 6 to clarify this statement.]  The Catholic Church also Christianized that ‘Great Goddess’ of the circus ring, Fairy Godmother, as The Holy Virgin Mother Mary, Queen of Heaven.  Fairy Godmother is the Cosmic Creatrix; co-creatrix with the cosmic creator-god, Pan. 

Catholicism Christianized her as ‘Mother Mary the Cosmic Creatrix,’ co-creator with god the father, and CO-REDEMTRIX with the son. 

Some Catholic crosses actually portray Mary as ‘co-redemptrix,’ with the Catholic Jesus still nailed to one side of the cross, and Mary to the other! 

The ‘holy trinity’ of Catholicism:

Fairy Godmother is also known as Isis, and as the Babylonian godmother Semiramus, wife of the ‘reincarnated’ Nimrod; mother to the cosmic christ Tammuz.  She is also represented by the occult symbol of the dove, which typifies the feminine ‘holy spirit.’ 

Likewise, the Catholic godmother, Mary, as co-creatrix and co-redemptrix, actually became the ‘wife’ of god, as she is part of the ‘holy trinity’ - that happy cosmic family, consisting of god the father, holy mother Mary, (the feminine holy spirit,) and baby Jesus, the cosmic christ.  This really brings the ‘holy trinity’ of Catholicism into perspective. 

The average Catholic, and even the average Catholic priest, does not know this, but in effect, the Roman Catholic trinity is NOT the Triune God of the Bible - God the Father, Jesus Christ the Son, and God the Holy Spirit.  In reality, the Catholic veneration of Mary as ‘the mother of god’ relates to the trinity of Nimrod, Semiramus, (the Babylonian holy spirit,) and Tammuz!  The real Mary was the human mother of the man Jesus Christ, but God has no mother: Heb. 7:1-3. 

Likewise, Lutheran-Calvinist Protestantism and their peers confess the ‘Holy Trinity’ as the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit.  However, they do not believe in the Biblical gifts, (or signs,) power, ministrations – and actual character of the Holy Spirit, (Mark 16:15-18.)  They confess the Name, but they do not accept the Person.  In effect they, too, do not believe in the Triune God of the Bible - as the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit are One and can never be separated. 

If one rejects One Person of the Godhead, one rejects the God of the Bible! – [See Jn. 15:26 & 1 Jn. 5:8 - which was omitted by most NKJV Bibles!] 

The spiritual ‘force field:’ 

Fairy Godmother emanates her presence in the form of a ring – a spiritual ‘force field,’ in which she protects her fairies; just as Godmother Mary manifests her presence in the form of a ring, the ‘church,’ in which she protects her Christians.  [See Part 6.]

Maurice Chatelaine wrote, ‘The Druids worshipped the earth as the body of the fairy goddess herself, and named her ‘Mother Earth.’  They worshipped her at sacred sites such as Chanters, France – the exact same site on which the Catholic Church built the Notre Dame Cathedrals.  The pattern of the ten most famous French cathedrals has the same configuration as the star constellation Virgo.  [Virgo represents the Virgin Queen of Heaven, Mary.]  These Druidic sites attracted religious pilgrims long before the time of Jesus.’

Of course, Catholic church fathers chose these religious temple sites as church sites for their religious significance and ‘cosmic energy.’

Following suit, Protestant Reformers and their hierarchical priesthoods also built elaborate church buildings, calling them ‘the house of God.’  And so Protestant leaders, [Lutheran, Calvinist, Pentecostal, Charismatic, and all their other church-building peers,] patterned their churches on Catholic cathedrals, which were erected to ‘emanate’ the ‘force field’ of that idolatrous Fairy Godmother, Mary. 

 

THE SYMBOL OF CHURCH UNION:

The building of temples, [refer to ‘Part 6, Giants, Fairy Godmother and the Circus Ring,] quickly became the religious-compulsive behavior of Christianity as well, just as in Babylonian days.  The Christian concept of ‘the church is the house of god’ also resulted in the building of unbelievably expensive, highly industrious cathedrals with accompanying towers.  [This church is not in the Bible, as explained in Part 6.] 

This strange, hierarchical Christian Brotherhood actually became the spiritual offspring of the hybrid Babylonian species, the temple servants or ‘Nephîycîym.’  Here, in the ‘house of their god,’ they, too, initiated, and still initiate devotees into the satanic mysteries of their religion.  The Christian hierarchical Brotherhood also ‘went after strange flesh,’ (uniting the Gospel and strange, pagan religion,) until eventually, they became spiritual ‘giants’ here on the earth. [One can only understand these statements if you read Part 6.]  Right across the globe, their impressive pagan temple-churches scar the perfect skyline of the Living God.  The noise of their pagan bells pollutes the air.  Their ‘holy’ robes typify their outward religious form, while inwardly, they bear the image of the perverted beast.  They have ‘two horns like a lamb’, but they speak the twisted tongue of the antichrist, that ‘anti-creational’ dragon of Rev. 13:11. 

Similarly, the early church fathers Christianized the Babylonian Tower - the symbol of sun or phallic worship, which defines spiritual ‘interbreeding.’  The church tower actually characterizes the ‘unlike spiritual union’ between Jesus’ truth and false doctrine; between Holy-Spirit gifts and satanic imitation; between Godly worship and pagan frenzy; between Biblical commandments and pagan ritual; between Jesus’ body and the religious harlot.  And ultimately, it attempts to represent a union between Christ and the devil. - [1 Cor. 6:15-19; 10:17-21; 2 Cor. 6:14-18.] 

 

THE POOR MAN’S SHACK “IN THE SHADOW OF THE IMPRESSIVE CHURCH:” 

Davis and Clark rightfully asked in their remarkable work, ‘The Great Ecclesiastical Conspiracy,’ “Did Jesus model one thing, only to build another…? [Scripturally,] the word ‘house’ [G: ‘oikos,’] speaks of a family, not a building…” - [1 Pt. 2:5; 1:18-19.] 

Just as the post-flood Babylonian Brotherhood, the Christian Brotherhood of archbishop, bishop, etc., or Protestant minister, elders, deacons, etc., “reigned and still reigns from the temple, church or cathedral.  These were, and are, very [imperialist, or] POLITICAL positions… [wrote Davis and Clark.] The king used the threat of an army and sheriffs [to control the churchgoers, while] the bishops threatened, [and still threaten,] the heavenly displeasure of God Himself…  [E.g., ‘we have the power or ‘anointing’ to bless and save you, or to curse you and send you to hell!’]

“Compared to the thatched roofed mud hut of the common serf, these [incredibly wealthy,] giant structures were an engineering feat and very intimidating… The common man was humbled by the very structure itself and was prone to think that the one who was the [head, or one of the heads] of such a building as this, [the church or house of god,] must be… God Himself.” 

Paupers versus Divine, Royal Priests: 

Let us never forget that by extorting non-contextual New Testament ‘tithes,’ church ‘taxes,’ excessive giving, ungodly indulgences, etc. from ‘common serfs’ just like us, church hierarchies had built and kept these houses-of-god systems for centuries.  Moreover, from the very formation of the church structure, us ‘common serfs’ had to provide these hierarchies with abundance and luxury. 

To this day, church hierarchies of all denominations still refer to their buildings of Scriptural abuse and extortion as ‘the house of god;’ binding the body of Christ to that great harlot, the ‘church’ of Babylonian Christianity!  But Paul declared in 1 Cor. 6:15, ‘Do you not know that your bodies are members of Christ?  Shall I then take the members of Christ and make them members of a harlot?  Certainly not!’ 

 

THE DOCTRINE OF THEOSIS: 

The Romans also accepted the Babylonian declaration that their kings were divine, associating the doctrine of ‘king and god,’ or actually ‘king IS god,’ (known as the doctrine of Theosis,) with the Roman Empire and the ‘divinity’ of Roman emperors.  As a result, the Roman Emperor became known as ‘Deus Pater,’ or Holy Father. 

The next step in the initial formation of the church, (the counterfeit of Jesus’ ecclesia,) was to Christianize this sacrilegious doctrine.  In direct defiance of Jesus’ commandment in Mt. 23:9, ‘Do not call anyone on earth your [spiritual] father; for One is your Father, He Who is in heaven,’ ‘saint’ Augustine deified a satanic substitute for God the Father, and declared the Catholic pope ‘Deus Pater,’ or ‘Holy Father.’  Then he took the doctrine of Theosis to the next level, deifying ordinary Catholic ‘priests,’ calling them ‘gods’ through their so-called ‘deification by the grace of Christ.’ 

Athanasius also declared, ‘God has made man that we might become gods;’ Jerome, ‘we are gods not by nature, but by grace,’ and Tertullian, ‘for as many as received Him, He gave power to become the ‘divine’ sons of God.’  Thus he exalted the ‘Holy Father’s’ entire hierarchical priesthood to the status of ‘fathers and mothers’ – or godfathers and godmothers – who then actually became the ‘divine’ priesthood of the Catholic church. 

To justify this satanic distortion of the humble servant-hood of Christ’s ecclesia, Augustine taught that the first disciples such as Peter and Paul were the ‘fathers’ of all the ‘Holy Fathers,’ the Catholic popes.  And so he exalted papal ‘godfathers’ to a level where they reached Catholic ‘sainthood’ and ‘papal infallibility.’ 

Officially, this distortion of Scripture turned ordinary disciples such as Peter and Paul into the ‘Infallible Holy God-Fathers’ or the first ‘popes’ of the Catholic priesthood.  Of course, this Christian version of Theosis exalted these ‘Saints,’ (the ‘Infallible, Divine Apostles’ and their Christian Brotherhood) high above ‘laity’ or ‘ordinary’ believers; the latter being the ACTUAL Biblical saints, according to the context of Scripture, (Rom. 1:1-7.)  Subsequently, the doctrine of ‘hierarchical Christian Theosis’ became a central part of orthodox belief and practice in the Roman Catholic Church – another evil doctrine, which Reformers such as Luther and Calvin gleaned directly from  Catholicism and stealthily wove into the very fibers of Protestantism as well. 

 

PROTESTANT THEOSIS: 

Martin Luther, and his close associate, William Tyndale, the translator or the Tyndale-Bible, the translators of the King James Bible, as well as John Calvin, unreservedly accepted the idolatrous doctrine of Christian Theosis as an integral part of their religion.  As a result, the so-called ‘uncorrupted Texus Receptus,’ the King James Version of 1611, still speaks of ‘The Gospel According To Saint Matthew; The Gospel according to Saint Mark; …Saint Luke, and …Saint John.’ 

Ultimately, all the church fathers disseminated the doctrine of Theosis. 

‘Wikipedia Online Encyclopedia’ declares in ‘The Truth About Theosis,’ ‘Early during the Reformation, thought was given to the concept of union with Christ (unio cum Christo) as the precursor to the entire process of salvation and sanctification.  This was especially so in the thought of JOHN CALVIN.  Theosis as a concept is [also] used among Methodists [including Afrikaans Reformed Churches such as the NG and NH…] Protestant Theosis implies the doctrine of entire sanctification which teaches… sinless Perfection… as Wesley described it.  They may not use the term theosis at all, though they refer to a similar concept by [their distorted view of] SANCTIFICATION.  Dietrich Bonhoeffer echoed Athanasius when he wrote "He has become like a man, so that men should be like him.”  – [‘The Cost of Discipleship, 301’]

That, of course, nullifies the Lutheran creed, “Sola Scriptura!”  The truth of Scripture was definitely NOT the basis of the Reformation, as we will see during the course of our study. 

This also reminds us of modern Christian-Theosis preachers and blasphemers such as Kenneth Copeland, Benny Hinn, Kenneth Hagen, John Avanzini, Herbert W. Armstrong, Morris Cerullo, and all those affiliated with them. 

Kenneth Hagen declared, ‘Man… was created on terms of equality with God…  That’s who we are; we’re Christ!’  Copeland said, ‘Of course we’re gods...  Satan conquered Jesus on the cross… and tortured Him in hell… where Jesus was an emaciated, poured out, little, wormy spirit…’ - [‘Christianity in Crisis;’ Hanegraaf; ‘Augustine and Neo-Platonism,’ African Christianity; ‘Augustine of Hippo,’ Wikipedia.] 

 

THE DEFORMED CIRCLE HAS THOUSANDS OF HEADS: 

Jesus declared that He Alone is God, Christ, High Priest and Head of ALL His believers - who are mere members of His body.  Paul also taught the disciples, ‘For by one Spirit we were ALL baptized into one body – whether Jews or Greeks, slaves or free, men or women…’ 

A body can only be steered and directed by ONE brain, or one head: Jn. 14:6. 

Just as a natural body, the members of Jesus’ body have different functions, and so the Spirit gave them different GIFTS – Eph. 5:22-27; Gal. 3:28; 1 Cor. 12:13. 

But in relation to the Head, all - yes, all the members of His body are equal. 

Davis and Clark also exposed this appalling distortion of the original concept of the humble, spiritually mature ELDERLY or spiritually ‘older persons’ in ‘The Great Ecclesiastical Conspiracy,’ p. 15 – [Please read 1 Cor. 3:1-17!]  They wrote that the crafty Theosis-translators of the King James Bible changed “the Greek adjective ‘presbuteros,’ (‘older’ or ‘elderly’) to a noun, [‘elder,’] represented in the Eng. text by official, [divinely hierarchical] sounding titles, i.e. presbyter, [bishop, pastor, priest,] and ELDER…  The original word… is the G. ‘presbuteros’ which literally means [a spiritually] ‘aged person.’”

Jesus Christ is the Creator God